Context-mediated domain adaptation in multi-agent sensemaking
systems
Anton WolterPhD Student at Aarhus University
Leon HaagMaastricht University
Vaishali DhanoaAarhus University, TU Wien
Niklas ElmqvistAarhus University
EICS 2026
The problem: knowledge that never sticks
Imagine your research assistant never tires and reads every paper
overnight, but every morning forgets what's specific to your field:
the terminology that must be precise, the
methods you trust, and exactly
how you want a research question framed.
That is 2025's LLM agent. Every new session is a cold start that
repeats yesterday's mistakes.
Train implicitly, manage explicitly
Learn domain knowledge from ordinary use, yet keep it
inspectable and editable
Externalize the knowledge
Persistent, scalable data structure that can be shared and
reused.
What if the AI learned from how you edit its answers?
And if you can understand it?
Demo: Research Question Generation
The AI drafts a research question based on a given paper for users
to refine it.
Goal: Enrich the everyday text box, already everywhere, with AI
that learns from your edits.
Disclaimer #1: Research questions serve as a proof-of-concept
domain for CMDA; we take no position on whether AI belongs in
research ideation.
Disclaimer #2: The live system’s dependencies were
compromised since the study, so this demo mocks the AI
background processing.
Backup · Direct manipulation
Inline edit of the generated question; every change is captured
with provenance and edit distance.
Backup · Prompt-based regeneration
A natural-language modification prompt regenerates the artifact;
the intent behind the change becomes a learning signal.
Demo: Knowledge Extraction
One edit, one lesson: the system writes down what the correction
taught it.
The expert's edit
“…how does geometric zoom
semantic zoom affect comprehension…”
↓ the system writes down
Knowledge entry
In this domain, “semantic zoom”
is the precise term — not “geometric zoom”.
terminology
Context-Mediated Domain Adaptation:
Every edit is implicit domain knowledge. The artifact and the system's context evolve together, and converge.
Capture what the user changes in the artifact
Extract the domain knowledge behind those edits
Propagate it back as context for the next
generation
Architecture
A portable, domain-agnostic loop, accumulated knowledge kept
steerable.
Deterministic edit measurement
The learning loop is only as trustworthy as the signal feeding:
every edit is measured deterministically so knowledge extraction and
our evaluation rest on auditable numbers.
Evaluation
Five visualization-literacy experts sequentially refined
AI-generated research questions across three papers inheriting the
knowledge accumulated.
Knowledge entries
46
extracted from the experts’ edits
Avg. quality rating
2.9 → 4.1
first expert → later experts
Time, all three papers
18.9 → 10.6
min
first expert → fifth expert
Future work
Connect further domains
Medical literature, code, …
Let users interact with the knowledge itself
What should experts see of what the system has learned and how
do they inspect, curate, and correct it?
Scale up knowledge management
Orchestrate knowledge between users, and evaluate the format
itself against emerging open standards
e.g. Google’s Open Knowledge Format, 2026
Thank you
Context-mediated domain adaptation in multi-agent sensemaking
systems
Edits are specifications: expert corrections
carry tacit domain knowledge
Capture → extract → inject: CMDA turns
edits into an inspectable Adaptive Context Object
Knowledge persists: it transfers across sessions
and users, beyond a single chat
It already (probably) worked: 46 entries from
five experts; quality up, time down
This work was supported partly by Villum Investigator grant VL-54492
by Villum Fonden. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed
in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily
reflect the views of the funding agency.
Grounding in the literature
Context-mediated behavior
Agents adapt their reasoning to the situation by carrying
explicit context, not just fixed rules.
Turner 1998
Explicit-context agents
Separating context from skills lets agents generalize to new
situations and learn more robustly.
Munguía-Galeano et al. 2023
Latent preference from edits · infer what a user
wants from how they edit (CIPHER)
[Gao et al. 2024]
Coactive learning for LLMs · every edit is a
preference signal [Tucker et al. 2024]
Persistent memory & user profiles · long-term
personalization of LLM agents
[Westhäußer et al. 2025]
Still distinct to Seedentia: adaptation at the
artifact level,
interpretable knowledge you can inspect and edit,
and cross-user
transfer, not per-user model tuning.